General News » News

Company fined after construction worker’s death in Tottenham

July 26, 2019   ·   0 Comments

By Brock Weir

A Japanese company has been levelled a fine of $130,000 following the death of a worker at a site in Tottenham in 2017.

Access Limited, an engineering company focused on the development, design and manufacture of automation equipment, was convicted by the Province of Ontario on Thursday. In addition to the $130,000 fine, the court has imposed a 25 per cent victim fine surcharge as required by the Provincial Offences Act. The surcharge is credited to a special government fund to assist victims of crime.

The death in question took place on the evening of August 30, 2017.

Two workers employed by Access Limited were assisting with the installation of a new metal stamping press and feeder at a manufacturing facility located at 1 Nolan Road.

“It was determined it would be safer to do so overnight when the equipment was not being operated by press technicians,” the court found. “The power to the press machine was turned off, but a piece of equipment known as a ‘destacker feeder’ remained powered and operational. One of the workers briefly left the work area in the early hours of August 31 and observed the other worker performing diagnostic testing at the destacker feeder control panel.

“Upon returning, the worker discovered the victim’s body positioned in front of a part of the destacker feeder known as the ‘DB bucket car.’ This car is a small mechanized cart which travels along rails. There is fencing surrounding the loading area for the bucket car which has an opening that allows the car to leave the loading area to the unloading area. The body was found pinned between the edge of the bucket car and the frame of the fencing that surrounds the bucket car opening. There were no witnesses to the incident.”

An investigation was subsequently carried out by the Ministry of Labour, which determined the cause of the death was likely that “while the worker was present within the fenced area, the bucket car started and moved along the rail towards the opening of the fence and the worker.”

“The investigation also revealed that safety interlock circuits were installed around the bucket car. If the fence door to the loading area is open or not present, the safety interlock circuits would be triggered and the bucket car would be prevented from moving. However, these safety interlock circuits had been overridden. The investigation did not reveal who overrode the interlock circuits or why.

“Section 25(2)(h) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act requires an employer to take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of a worker. The investigation determined that a reasonable precaution would have been to ensure control switches or mechanisms for the bucket car were locked out to prevent the starting of the bucket car where the starting of the car may endanger a worker. It was found that there were no other effective precautions taken by the company to prevent the starting of the bucket car where a worker may be endangered by such movement.”



         


Readers Comments (0)


You must be logged in to post a comment.

Page Reader Press Enter to Read Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Pause or Restart Reading Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Stop Reading Page Content Out Loud Screen Reader Support